CELPIP Reading/R4

CELPIP Reading Part 4: Reading for Viewpoints

In Reading Part 4 you read an article with two or more opinions about a community issue and answer 5 questions, then fill 5 blanks in a reader's comment. You have about 13 minutes for about 10 questions.

Practice Reading for Viewpoints Now

The official format of Reading Part 4: Reading for Viewpoints

Questions
about 10
Timer
about 13 minutes for this part alone
What you read
An article with two or more opinions about a community issue (5 questions), then a short comment from a reader with blanks to fill in (5 questions).
Answers
Four choices for each question. The text and all its questions are on one screen.

CELPIP's suggested steps for Reading Part 4

From CELPIP's Reading Pro Study Pack (2026).

  1. Read question set 1 and identify helpful keywords (1 minute).
  2. Identify the topic, and the opinions on it: who is mentioned, what they believe, and why (3 minutes).
  3. Answer question set 1, using your notes, inference and paraphrase.
  4. Read the reader's comment and use context to work out the commenter's opinion, then fill the blanks.
  5. Leave 30 seconds at the end to make sure you have answered every question.

The opinion map for Part 4

CELPIP's preview for Part 4, as a map: the topic, then each person.

1TopicWhat is the article about?
2Person 1Who, what they believe, and why.
3Person 2Who, what they believe, and why.
4Person 3Who, what they believe, and why.

A worked CELPIP Reading Part 4 example

Read the text
Should Maple Street Stay Car-Free?

This summer, the city of Westbrook closed Maple Street to cars every Saturday and Sunday as a trial. For three months, the busy shopping street was turned into a space for walking, with benches, food stalls and live music. Last week, city council voted to make the weekend closures permanent starting next spring, and the decision has divided the neighborhood.

City council member Ana Ruiz, who first proposed the idea, says the trial proved its value. According to Ruiz, families now come downtown to spend the whole afternoon instead of driving in for a single errand. She also points to safety, noting that the street had several minor accidents involving cyclists last year and none during the trial weekends.

Not everyone is convinced. Tom Becker, who has run a hardware store on Maple Street for many years, says his weekend sales fell during the trial. Becker explains that his customers often buy heavy items, such as paint and lumber, and they do not want to carry them several blocks to a parking lot. In his view, the closures help restaurants but hurt shops like his.

Longtime resident Grace Liu sees both sides. Liu enjoys the quieter weekends and says the street finally feels like a real community space. However, because she has trouble walking long distances, she found it hard to reach the shops she relies on. Liu would like the city to keep the closures but add a free shuttle from the parking lot, a suggestion council has agreed to study before the spring.

THE QUESTIONS (5)
  1. The article is mainly about
    1. why Maple Street has so many accidents
    2. different reactions to a city decision
    3. how to open a business downtown
    4. a new parking lot in Westbrook
  2. According to Ruiz, the trial showed that
    1. restaurants made more money than shops
    2. cyclists prefer other streets
    3. more people drove downtown
    4. families stayed downtown longer
  3. Becker's main concern is that
    1. his customers cannot easily carry their purchases
    2. the live music is too loud
    3. the food stalls compete with his store
    4. accidents will increase
  4. Liu's opinion of the closures is
    1. completely against them
    2. the same as Becker's
    3. in favor, if access improves
    4. only about the noise
  5. Becker would most likely agree that
    1. every business gains from the closures
    2. the closures suit some businesses better than others
    3. the street needs more food stalls
    4. the trial was too short to judge
Show the answers and why
  1. B. Question one asks what the whole article is about. It opens with the decision, and says it has divided the neighborhood. So it's about different reactions. It's B.
  2. D. Question two is about Ruiz, so look in her part. Restaurants are Becker's point, not hers. Families now come downtown to spend the whole afternoon. That means they stayed longer. So the answer to question two is D.
  3. A. Question three is Becker's concern. They do not want to carry them several blocks. In new words, they cannot easily carry their purchases. It's A.
  4. C. Question four is Liu, and however is the turn. She enjoys the quiet, however she has trouble walking. She wants to keep the closures but add a shuttle. That's in favor, with a condition. So the answer is C.
  5. B. Question five is an inference about Becker. He says the closures help restaurants but hurt shops like his. So he would agree they suit some businesses better than others. It's B.

Map who believes what, and why, then match each question to the right person.

A free CELPIP Reading Part 4: Reading for Viewpoints practice question

Remote Work Policy in Canadian Public Sector

Read the article and answer the questions. Then read the response and fill in the blanks.

Read the passage

It's Time to End Mandatory Return-to-Office Policies in Canada's Public Sector

By Margaret Chen

The federal government's recent push to bring public servants back to the office full-time is a step backward that ignores both employee wellbeing and practical realities. After three years of successful remote work during the pandemic, forcing civil servants back to their desks seems particularly tone-deaf. The evidence is overwhelming: remote work has maintained productivity levels while significantly improving work-life balance for thousands of Canadian families. Public sector employees have proven they can deliver essential services from home, often with greater efficiency and job satisfaction. Moreover, the environmental benefits cannot be ignored. Fewer commutes mean reduced carbon emissions, directly supporting Canada's climate commitments. The cost savings are equally compelling – both for employees who save on transportation and meals, and for taxpayers who benefit from reduced office space requirements. Critics argue that collaboration suffers in remote environments, but modern technology has proven this concern largely unfounded. Video conferencing, digital collaboration tools, and flexible hybrid arrangements can maintain team cohesion while preserving the benefits of remote work. Instead of rigid return-to-office mandates, the government should embrace flexible work arrangements that trust employees to determine where they work best. This approach would position Canada as a progressive employer, helping attract and retain top talent in an increasingly competitive job market. The future of work is flexible, and our government policies should reflect this reality.

  1. What is the author's main argument regarding return-to-office policies?
    1. They should be implemented gradually over several months
    2. They are outdated and should be replaced with flexible work arrangements
    3. They are necessary for maintaining government accountability
    4. They should only apply to senior management positions
  2. According to the author, what evidence supports remote work effectiveness?
    1. Increased government revenue and reduced operational costs
    2. Higher employee turnover and improved recruitment numbers
    3. Maintained productivity levels and improved work-life balance
    4. Better customer service ratings and faster response times
  3. What tone does the author use when discussing the government's return-to-office push?
    1. Neutral and analytical
    2. Critical and disapproving
    3. Supportive but cautious
    4. Enthusiastic and encouraging
Show the answers
  1. B. The author argues that mandatory return-to-office policies are 'a step backward' and advocates for flexible work arrangements that 'trust employees to determine where they work best.'
  2. C. The author specifically states that 'remote work has maintained productivity levels while significantly improving work-life balance for thousands of Canadian families.'
  3. B. The author uses critical language, calling the policy 'a step backward' and 'particularly tone-deaf,' indicating strong disapproval of the government's approach.
Try this question free →

Common mistakes on Part 4: Reading for Viewpoints

  • Mixing up whose opinion is whose. Map each person before the questions.
  • Missing the reason. Many questions ask why someone holds an opinion.
  • Choosing an answer that copies the article's words. The right answer usually paraphrases.
  • Forgetting the second text, the reader's comment with blanks.

Ready to practice?

Practice Reading for Viewpoints questions with instant scoring and detailed explanations.

Start Practicing

Part 4: Reading for Viewpoints FAQ

How many questions are in CELPIP Reading Part 4?+

About 10, in about 13 minutes: 5 about the article and 5 blanks in a reader's comment.

What kind of text is in Reading Part 4?+

An article with two or more opinions about a community issue, then a short comment from a reader with blanks to fill in.

What should I note in the Part 4 preview?+

The topic, and for each opinion: who is mentioned, what they believe, and why.

Why is Part 4 the hardest reading part?+

CELPIP says the reading parts increase in difficulty from Part 1 to Part 4, and Part 4 is formal, conceptual and persuasive.

Related reading

← Back to CELPIP Reading